ONA Student Newsroom
  • Data reveal differences in return to in-person schooling
    • June 26, 2021
  • How three news start-ups approached innovation in 2020
    • June 22, 2021
  • Sports journalists, from left, Matt Musil of KHOW TV, Emily Giangreco of KVUE TV, and John Affleck, the Knight Chair for Sports Journalism at Penn State University.
    Virtual group interviews are changing sports coverage
    • June 22, 2021
  • In their memory: Pandemic offers opportunities to transform digital obits
    • June 21, 2021
  • COVID-19 vaccine incentives: do they work?
    • June 21, 2021
  • Home
  • ONA23 Conference
  • Online Journalism Awards
  • Ethics Tool
  • Knowledge Base
  • ONA Insights
  • Member Log In
ONA Student Newsroom
  • Innovation

Data Analysis: The most influential speakers and sessions at ONA17

  • Kenny Jacoby
  • October 9, 2017
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

 

The ONA conference is as much about building one’s brand as it is about sharing new skills and ideas. So who were the most influential speakers of ONA17, and which sessions were most impactful?

To find out, I wrote computer programs to analyze each speaker’s Twitter accounts before and after the conference, as well as the tweet activity for each session’s hashtag. Here are some of my findings:

  • ONA speakers combined to gain at least 13,500 new followers from the beginning to the end of the conference. OJA award winner David Fahrenthold led the way, gaining 5,180 new followers, followed by Brian Stelter (1,887), Nikole Hannah-Jones (652) and Amy Webb (498). The median increase was 16 new followers.
  • ONA session hashtags were used in more than 9,300 unique tweets during the conference. The most tweeted hashtag of conference was #ONA17trends, for Webb’s 10 Tech Trends in Journalism: 10th Anniversary Edition session, with 2,227 mentions. #OJA17 (Online Journalism Awards banquet and reception) received 1,277 mentions, and #ONA17keynote (Trust, Truth and Questions for the Media with Hannah-Jones, Michelle Holmes, Asma Khalid, Elle Reeve and Cenk Uyger) received 580.
  • Twenty-eight percent of speakers improved their Twitter influence scores during ONA17, according to klout.com, a website that measures social media impact through an algorithm that factors in retweets, favorites, impressions and other metrics users receive on their tweets. Pete Brown, Jessica Parker Gilbert and Jacque Boltik increased their scores, which are awarded on a 100-point scale, by double digits.

 

ONA Speakers: How Many Twitter Followers Did You Gain During ONA17?Hover over a box on the left or click a name on the right.

Using a Python library called “Tweepy,” which accesses the Twitter API, I wrote a program to scrape the user IDs of each ONA17 speaker’s Twitter followers, as well as the speaker’s “Klout Score.” I ran the program once on Oct. 4 — the day before the conference began — to collect a baseline for each metric, then ran it again on Oct. 7 — the last day of the conference — and compared the results to see who got the biggest bump.

I also wrote another program that first scraped the hashtags for each session off the ONA website, then, on the last day of the conference, downloaded all the tweets in which the hashtag was used since the first day of the conference. It also pulled the date and time they were tweeted and the screen names of the users who tweeted them.

Which Sessions Were Tweeted About Most at ONA17?Hover over a bubble on the left or click a hashtag on the right.

The frameworks for the programs were similar to that of the program I wrote for an ONA Student Newsroom story on Oct. 5, which examined the most followed accounts by ONA speakers, the size of their audiences and their connections to accounts of other speakers. I’ve posted the full code for each of the programs in my GitHub repository.

Due to deadline constraints, speaker Ev Williams, who has nearly 2 million Twitter followers, was not included in this analysis. This is because the Twitter API has rate limits that restrict the number of requests a user can make in a given time frame, and scraping each of his followers’ user IDs takes many hours to complete.

ONA Speakers: Did Your Twitter Influence Improve During ONA17?We compared each speaker's Klout Score before and after the conference.

 

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
Kenny Jacoby

Previous Article
Online Journalism Awards on display before the start of the 2017 ceremony. (Photo by Christian Monterrosa/ONA Student Newsroom) Oct. 7, 2017
  • Awards

2017 Online Journalism Awards: And the winner is …

  • Alicia Abelson and Christian Monterrosa and Sebastian Vega and Victoria Hoffman
  • October 8, 2017
Read More
Next Article
  • Voices

Voices: Flint chose me

  • Zoe Jackson
  • September 12, 2018
Read More

Special thanks to our Patron Sponsors
Google News Initiative logo

Content Authenticity Initiative logo

…and our Supporting Sponsors
Microsoft logo
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution logo

Top Articles
  • 1
    Ever heard of a ‘newsgame’? They aren’t as new as you might think
    • September 24, 2022
  • A table with three speakers sit in front of a room with people at round tables 2
    As journalists look to build trust, solutions journalism might help
    • September 24, 2022
  • Why news organizations are pivoting to short-form video and TikTok
    • September 24, 2022
  • screen shot of Zine produced by the ONA Newsroom in 2022 4
    To paper and back again – the #ONAZine
    • September 24, 2022
  • 5
    Women’s Leadership Accelerator cohorts back in person after two years
    • September 24, 2022
@ONANewsroom
My Tweets

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

ONA Student Newsroom
Daily conference coverage from ONA's student newsroom

Input your search keywords and press Enter.