ONA Student Newsroom
  • Data reveal differences in return to in-person schooling
    • June 26, 2021
  • How three news start-ups approached innovation in 2020
    • June 22, 2021
  • Sports journalists, from left, Matt Musil of KHOW TV, Emily Giangreco of KVUE TV, and John Affleck, the Knight Chair for Sports Journalism at Penn State University.
    Virtual group interviews are changing sports coverage
    • June 22, 2021
  • In their memory: Pandemic offers opportunities to transform digital obits
    • June 21, 2021
  • COVID-19 vaccine incentives: do they work?
    • June 21, 2021
  • Home
  • ONA23 Conference
  • Online Journalism Awards
  • Ethics Tool
  • Knowledge Base
  • ONA Insights
  • Member Log In
ONA Student Newsroom
  • Diversity

Film makes fight for women’s right to vote personal

  • Christina Romualdo
  • December 26, 2015
  • 4 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

The power of “Suffragette” stems from how personal it is.

The film follows the transformation of a British working-class woman in 1912. She starts off as a loving mother and devoted wife and, through personal crises, grows into a strong leading figure in the British Women’s Rights Movement.

“Suffragette” starts off like any other British period piece. It opens with Maud Watts, played by Academy Award-nominated actress Carey Mulligan, walking down a grimy street in London’s East End. Her face is worn, her body tired and her clothes as shabby as her soul.

Maud is happily married to Sonny, played by Ben Whishaw, and they are the proud parents of a little boy named George. Maud’s love for her son radiates off the screen and never wavers.

Both Maud and Sonny are employed at the same laundry mill, a bleak and depressing work environment run by a misogynistic middle-aged overlord who sexually abuses his female workers. Despite awful work conditions for Maud and other women, an unconventional female presence disrupts the work setting. Violet Miller, played by Anne-Marie Duff, defends herself against the male overseer and shouts “Votes for Women!” periodically throughout the workday.

xwy3agrntodoj6pp9nnoViolet tries to recruit Maud into joining the British Women’s Rights Movement. Maud resists at first in fear of social ridicule, but eventually finds her voice at a Parliament hearing in front of Chancellor of the Exchequer David Lloyd George a few weeks later. Despite threats to her domestic identity — halfway through the movie, Sonny kicks Maud from their home and puts up their son for adoption — Maud eventually grows into a voting rights advocate and challenges the political, social and economical spheres of the male patriarchy.

While Maud is a composite character drawn from several figures in the suffragette movement, she is surrounded by historical heavyweights such as Emmeline Pankhurst, the mother of the voting rights movement, and Emily Wilding Davison, who famously lost her life after stepping onto the track at the Epsom Derby to gain the attention of King George V. While Davison was holding a banner proclaiming “Votes for Women,” the king’s horse ran into her at top speed.  After she died of her injuries in the hospital, Davison became a martyr for the movement.

Interestingly, screenwriter Abi Morgan noted that lost footage of Davison’s death at the derby was found after a film canister was discovered at the British Film Institute, and it was developed for the production of this movie.

Historically speaking, the British Women’s Rights Movement involved women from all walks of life. Interestingly, this film depicts working-class women as the foot soldiers, sacrificing their lives, families and reputations for the cause, while upper-class women hid from the law, quietly funding and organizing rallies from afar.

Among this diverse group, all of the women had their own personal ties to greater fight for voting rights. It wasn’t just about a collective rebellion, but the individual efforts of each female who wanted a better life for themselves.

Suffragette is also striking in its willingness to depict brutality against women in a harsh light. The film does not shy away from graphic images of women being beat up by male police officers at a rally or being force-fed in prison for going on hunger strikes. The images are jarring and emotional, but closer to reality than the bonnet-wearing, flower-toting, peacefully-walking suffragettes of “Mary Poppins.”

Any movie that covers the issues of gender equality faces the issue of pitting men versus women. It’s very easy to paint men as the villain and women as the strong, brave protagonists, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing if you want to do a straight historical portrayal of the fight for equality.

However, the interesting thing to note about “Suffragette” is that it’s not just a historical feature – it doesn’t want to relegate the fight to the past. Instead, it wants to pull the fight forward and make it applicable to today’s society. Indeed, with a hashtag like #FightsNotOver and closing cards that emphasize that women in Saudi Arabia have only been afforded the right to vote this very year, it seems to fulfill its role as a call-to-arms for modern-day suffragettes.

Today, women still are fighting for equality among male peers. As one audience member put it, “We still don’t have equal pay, but that’s another story.” Although most women have the right to vote, obtain an education, achieve custody and own stocks, there is still work that needs to be done.

The average woman makes 77 cents less than her male co-worker. It is appalling that we still don’t have equal pay in the workplace.

Although the original British Women’s Movement heroines are long gone, 103 years later we are still advocating for fair salaries.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
Christina Romualdo

Previous Article
  • Hallway Track

Humans of ONA15

  • KarishmaAsoodani
  • December 26, 2015
Read More
Next Article
  • Industry

Video: The impact of internships

  • ShuyaoChen
  • December 26, 2015
Read More

Special thanks to our Patron Sponsors
Google News Initiative logo

Content Authenticity Initiative logo

…and our Supporting Sponsors
Microsoft logo
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution logo

Top Articles
  • 1
    Ever heard of a ‘newsgame’? They aren’t as new as you might think
    • September 24, 2022
  • A table with three speakers sit in front of a room with people at round tables 2
    As journalists look to build trust, solutions journalism might help
    • September 24, 2022
  • Why news organizations are pivoting to short-form video and TikTok
    • September 24, 2022
  • screen shot of Zine produced by the ONA Newsroom in 2022 4
    To paper and back again – the #ONAZine
    • September 24, 2022
  • 5
    Women’s Leadership Accelerator cohorts back in person after two years
    • September 24, 2022
@ONANewsroom
My Tweets

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

ONA Student Newsroom
Daily conference coverage from ONA's student newsroom

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.